ÆùŸÀÓÁî ¼Ò°³

·Î°í

Untitled Document
 
 
 
Untitled Document
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  Home > ¸¶ÀÌÆäÀÌÁö > ´º½º
Hollywood Remakes: Preserving Classics or Stifling Creativity?
0What¡¯s This About?

Hollywood, the epicenter of the global film industry, has witnessed a distinctive trend in recent years ? the proliferation of remakes. This trend has received a mixed reception from audiences. While some argue that remakes are a necessary homage to the classics, others contend that this practice stifles creativity. The two panelists will now present their stances on this issue.


Constructive

Pro Finn

I am not against Hollywood¡¯s penchant for remaking classic movies, as these adaptations serve several critical purposes. One primary purpose lies in reintroducing forgotten classics to new generations. Remakes allow filmmakers to breathe new life into beloved tales, making them more accessible and engaging to contemporary audiences. For example, filmmakers may incorporate new narrative structures, character development, and themes that resonate with present-day viewers but may be missing in the original content. In addition, by employing cutting-edge techniques in cinematography, special effects, and sound design, filmmakers can introduce a new level of visual and auditory spectacle to these enduring tales. Consider recent successes like A Star is Born or Dune. These films captured the essence of their original counterparts while bringing something fresh and relevant to the table.


Con Alice

Hollywood¡¯s overreliance on remakes needs to end. Never before have we seen so many prequels, sequels, reboots, and remakes churned out by film studios than in the past few years. Yet, this focus on retelling established franchises and familiar stories over exploring the uncharted territory of original content is harming the growth of the film industry. The rehashings typically yield generic versions of the originals, seldom introducing anything novel or groundbreaking. And the saturation of remakes reduces opportunities for emerging filmmakers and writers with fresh, original perspectives to showcase their talents. With little injection of new ideas and techniques, the industry has stagnated. Studios should invest more in original films that challenge societal norms and push the boundaries of cinematic art than in recycled stories that we¡¯re all tired of.


Rebuttal

Pro Finn

While I appreciate the call for originality, we must acknowledge the practical aspects of the industry. Hollywood is a business, and remakes, with their built-in recognition and play on nostalgia, are often a safer bet for studios. The revenue generated from successful remakes, in turn, can bring more investment for new and risky projects. It is a symbiotic relationship that allows a balance between financial stability and artistic exploration. Moreover, remakes offer a chance to rectify the shortcomings of their predecessors. As time passes, technological limitations, cultural shifts, or changing norms can make classic films feel outdated or insensitive. By retelling old narratives through a contemporary lens, filmmakers can address these issues, adapting stories to align with modern values and sensibilities and thus enhancing their storytelling and emotional impact.


Con Alice

I understand the economic considerations, but we cannot sacrifice the film industry¡¯s soul for financial security. While embracing originality might involve more risk, the potential rewards it would bring in both cultural impact and artistic contribution are immeasurable. Let¡¯s not forget that some of cinema history¡¯s most beloved and enduring classics were once original creations. Furthermore, remakes can dilute the artistic value of the original work, as the reinterpretation might lack the authenticity, nuance, or emotional resonance of the original. One could argue that attempting to update or modernize classics that perfectly suited their original context risks tarnishing their legacy and the original message the filmmakers wished to convey. Hollywood¡¯s current profit-driven approach undermines the true purpose of filmmaking as an art form meant to inspire, challenge, and provoke thought.


Judge¡¯s Comments

That concludes today¡¯s debate. Those were some intriguing arguments presented by the debaters. The conversation will no doubt continue as the industry grapples with finding the right balance between paying homage to the past and pursuing new storytelling. What do you think about Hollywood¡¯s penchant for remaking classics?


Yesel Kang
Copy Editor
 
Àμâ±â´ÉÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
1. What are the main arguments made by the first speech of the pro side?
2. What are the main arguments made by the first speech of the con side?
3. What are the main arguments made by the second speech of the pro side?
4. What are the main arguments made by the second speech of the con side?
 
1. Do you agree with the arguments of the pro side? Explain why or why not.
2. Do you agree with the arguments of the con side? Explain why or why not.
3. Which side has more convincing arguments? Explain your reasoning.
4. What are some ways to enhance creativity? What are instances of expressing creativity?
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ | ȸ»çÀ§Ä¡ | Á¦ÈÞ ¹× Á¦¾È | ±¤°í¾È³» | °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸ º¸È£Á¤Ã¥ | À̸ÞÀϹ«´Ü¼öÁý°ÅºÎ | Site ÀÌ¿ë¾È³» | FAQ | Áö¿øÇÁ·Î±×·¥