Walking vs. Running: What’s Better for Your Health?
Introduction>>
People have long debated whether walking or running is better for one’s health. Both activities offer numerous health benefits but differ in intensity, impact, and suitability for individuals.
Constructive Debater 1 Marie
Walking is a superior exercise for long-term health and sustainability. Regular walking can improve heart health, lower blood pressure, and reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease. In addition, walking is a more accessible physical activity that anyone can easily incorporate into their daily routine. The American Heart Association recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week, which one can achieve with a brisk walk.
Constructive Debater 2 Charlotte
Running is better for one’s metabolism and heart. It is a high-intensity activity that efficiently burns calories, making it an effective exercise for weight loss and management. Studies have shown that running can improve heart health, increase lung capacity, strengthen muscles, and help build strong bones more effectively than walking. Moreover, running stimulates the release of endorphins, often referred to as a “runner’s high,” which can enhance mental health and overall well-being.
Rebuttal Debater 1 Marie
Yes, running may be a faster way to lose weight, but its high-impact nature increases the risk of injuries, such as shin splints, stress fractures, and strained knee ligaments or muscles. These risks can discourage people from following a consistent exercise routine. Additionally, running may not be suitable for everyone, particularly older adults or those with pre-existing joint conditions, since it’s much harder on the joints. The intense nature of running can also lead to burnout or overtraining, potentially resulting in long-term health issues. In contrast, walking poses a lower risk of injury and can be maintained consistently.
Rebuttal Debater 2 Charlotte
No one would disagree that walking is good for your health, but it may not be enough for those seeking more dramatic health improvements or weight loss. Walking burns fewer calories per minute compared to running, thus requiring more time to achieve similar fitness goals. Since it takes longer to burn the same amount of calories, it would mean that people have to walk for longer to have the same effects of running a shorter distance. Not everyone has the time for long workouts, which is another reason why walking can actually be less accessible.
Judge’s Comments
Depending on your fitness goal and lifestyle, walking or running may be more suitable as an exercise. Walking is accessible, low-impact, and sustainable while running provides an intensive workout and burns more calories, making it appealing to those seeking significant fitness improvements.
Hannah Kim For The Junior Times junior/1717462450/1613368104
1. What are the arguments of constructive debater 1?
2. What are the arguments of constructive debater 2?
3. What are the arguments of rebuttal debater 1?
4. What are the arguments of rebuttal debater 2?
1. What do you think of the constructive point of view? Explain.
2. What kind of sports or exercises incorporate running? How do you play them?
3. What do you think of the rebuttal point of view? Explain.
4. What are some ways to achieve weight loss? Explain.
Introduction>>
Constructive Debater 1 Marie
Constructive Debater 2 Charlotte
Rebuttal Debater 1 Marie 
Rebuttal Debater 2 Charlotte
Judge’s Comments
